Misappropriation and Right of Publicity
Misappropriation and Right of Publicity
Short FAQ guide on misappropriation of name/likeness and Texas Right of Publicity.
What is “misappropriation of name and likeness” and how does it affect me?
Misappropriation is using someone’s identity (name, image, voice, or other recognizable traits) for an advantage—most often in advertising or commercial promotion—without permission.
Example: using a sound-alike voice or a recognizable catchphrase to suggest endorsement.
What can I recover in a misappropriation lawsuit?
Recoveries can vary, but may include non-monetary harms (like mental anguish) and economic losses (like past/future wages), depending on the facts of the case.
What is the Right of Publicity?
In Texas, the Right of Publicity is a property right connected to controlling commercial use of a deceased person’s identity (commonly name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness) after death.
Because it’s state-based, details can vary by state.
Why does the Right of Publicity matter?
This right may be transferred through estate planning or inherited by heirs, helping families control and benefit from how a person’s identity is used commercially.
Texas SOS info: FAQs / forms.
Are there permitted uses without consent?
Texas law recognizes certain authorized uses in specific contexts—often tied to expressive works and material that is primarily newsworthy or political.
When is use considered illegal?
Using a person’s identity to advertise, sell, or promote products or services without permission from the rights holder may violate the Right of Publicity.
What legal remedies exist?
Possible remedies can include damages and profits attributable to the unauthorized use, and—depending on the case—additional remedies such as attorney’s fees/costs.
Does the Right of Publicity last forever?
No. Texas law sets a term limit for the Right of Publicity that runs for a defined period measured from the individual’s death.
- Restatement (Second) of Torts §652C (1977)
- Moore v. Big Picture Co., 828 F.2d 270 (5th Cir. 1995)
- Henley v. Dillard Dept. Stores, 46 F. Supp. 2d 587 (N.D. Tex. 1999)
- Midler v. Ford Motor Co., 849 F.2d 460 (9th Cir. 1988)
- Carson v. Here’s Johnny Portable Toilets, Inc., 698 F.2d 831 (6th Cir. 1983)
- Texas Property Code Chapter 26
